Virginia Supreme Court extends judicial emergency again

The Supreme Court of Virginia announced today that they were extending the judicial emergency yet again.

Judicial Emergency Timeline

  • First Order – The Supreme Court of Virginia first declared a judicial emergency on March 16th at the request of the Governor. The declaration was for a period of 21 days which was slated to end on April 6th.
  • Second Order – On March 27, the Supreme Court of Virginia extended the judicial emergency for a second 21-day period which would have ended next Sunday, April 26th.
  • Third Order – Today (April 22nd), the Supreme Court of Virginia extended the judicial emergency for a third 21-day period, extending the termination date to May 17th.

For those clients who are anxiously awaiting the ability to schedule (or reschedule) their matters, I would not put any confidence in May 17th being the actual end of the judicial emergency.    I think there is a very real chance that it will be extended yet again.

I base this belief on the fact that, in today’s order extending the emergency (see below), the Supreme Court of Virginia specifically noted that the Governor has issued a ‘stay at home‘ order that does not end until June 10th.  I do not think that the mention of June 10th in today’s order was mere happenstance.  A fourth 21-day period would effectively end with court restarting on Monday June 8th and that would roughly coincide with the end of the governor’s ‘stay at home‘ order.

I hope that I am wrong and the Commonwealth is able to safely resume the operation of our courts before June, but until we know more, we should prepare for that eventuality.  I will keep all my clients informed as the situation changes.

Download (PDF, 60KB)

Posted in Virginia Courts, Virginia Supreme Court | Comments Off on Virginia Supreme Court extends judicial emergency again

Is it legal to carry an expandable baton in Virginia?

Is it legal to carry an expandable baton in Virginia?

Is it legal to carry an expandable baton in Virginia?”  I was asked this question today and thought it would make a good article.

As is often the case with seemingly simple questions like this one, there are nuances that must be addressed.  Let’s unpack all the hidden details of this question.

Defining Our Terms

First, we need to define what is meant by an ‘expandable baton’.  In addition, and perhaps more importantly, we need to define what it is not.

An ‘expandable baton’, is a nested series of metal or composite rods that can be extended with manual effort, usually the flick of a wrist.  They have no mechanical assistance in expanding.

There is a similar device which expands with a spring that the user can actuate.  For purposes of this analysis, this is not an ‘expandable baton’ but rather a ‘spring stick’.

The legal definition of a ‘spring stick’ is found in § 18.2-307.1, which defines it as “a spring-loaded metal stick activated by pushing a button that rapidly and forcefully telescopes the weapon to several times its original length.”

Now that we have our definitions in order, we can continue unpacking the other issues involved in answering the question.

Sale / Purchase

In order to ‘carry’ an item, you must be able to purchase and possess it. This additionally implies that it must be legal for the item to be sold to you in the first place. So we will first look to see if there is any legal prohibition on the sale, purchase, or possession of expandable batons in Virginia.

The only law which might apply is § 18.2-311 which states:

If any person sells or barters, or exhibits for sale or for barter, or gives or furnishes, or causes to be sold, bartered, given or furnished, or has in his possession, or under his control, with the intent of selling, bartering, giving or furnishing, any blackjack, brass or metal knucks, any disc of whatever configuration having at least two points or pointed blades which is designed to be thrown or propelled and which may be known as a throwing star or oriental dart, switchblade knife, ballistic knife as defined in § 18.2-307.1, or like weapons, such person is guilty of a Class 4 misdemeanor. The having in one’s possession of any such weapon shall be prima facie evidence, except in the case of a conservator of the peace, of his intent to sell, barter, give or furnish the same.

Given that an expandable baton is not in any way a blackjack, which is a flexible, leather-covered hand weapon that has a handle on one end and is weighted on the other, there is nothing in this statute which could be read to prohibit the sale, barter, or transfer of an expandable baton.

Carry

So now we are back to the heart of our question … “Is it legal to carry an expandable baton in Virginia?

When we talk about carry of a self-defense item, we often distinguish between open and concealed carry.  We do this for the simple reason that there are many items that are legal to carry when they are not concealed but are illegal to carry concealed … even with a permit.

And that bring us to one of the common misconceptions I encounter.  Many people still believe that Virginia issues a ‘Concealed Weapons Permit’.  While that used to be the case, it is now a ‘Concealed Handgun Permit’ and no longer allows other enumerated weapons to be carried concealed upon the person.

Having set the stage for our analysis, we have two questions we need to ask. “Is there a law making it illegal to possess or carry an expandable baton openly, and, if not, are they among the enumerated list of items that cannot be carried concealed upon the person?”

The answer to the first question is “no”.  There is no law in Virginia making it illegal to openly carry an ‘expandable baton’.

The answer to the second question is “no” as well but this answer comes with something of a caveat.  The concealed carry statute, located at § 18.2-308, prohibits the concealed carry of:

(i) any pistol, revolver, or other weapon designed or intended to propel a missile of any kind by action of an explosion of any combustible material;

(ii) any dirk, bowie knife, switchblade knife, ballistic knife, machete, razor, slingshot, spring stick, metal knucks, or blackjack;

(iii) any flailing instrument consisting of two or more rigid parts connected in such a manner as to allow them to swing freely, which may be known as a nun chahka, nun chuck, nunchaku, shuriken, or fighting chain;

(iv) any disc, of whatever configuration, having at least two points or pointed blades which is designed to be thrown or propelled and which may be known as a throwing star or oriental dart; or

(v) any weapon of like kind as those enumerated in this subsection

Since we have already discussed the definitional differences between an ‘expandable baton’ and a ‘blackjack’ or ‘spring stick’, the only possible provision which might be used to prosecute the concealed carry of an expandable baton is subsection (v) which broadly sweeps in weapons “of like kind.”

The question then becomes whether an officer or Commonwealth’s Attorney could possibly consider an expandable baton which extends manually via a flick of the wrist to be “of like kind” with a spring-loaded stick that actuates by the push of a button.

I believe any such attempt would strain credulity but I would be remiss in my duty if I didn’t note that it is not impossible that such an attempt could be made.  I have done a cursory search of case law and have found no such cases but it was not an exhaustive search.

Conclusion

So … “Is it legal to carry an expandable baton in Virginia?”  I believe the answer is “yes” with the qualifications noted in the previous section.


Disclaimer:  This information is presented for educational purposes only and does not give rise to an attorney-client relationship. Additionally, I am licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of Virginia and this answer may not be appropriate for other states. If you have further questions about this topic, please feel free to contact me for a free consultation.

Posted in Blackjack, Concealed Handgun Permit, Expandable Batons, Non-Traditional Weapons, Spring Stick, Virginia Concealed Handgun Permit, Virginia Law | Comments Off on Is it legal to carry an expandable baton in Virginia?

The Virginia State Crime Commission has issued their report on gun violence

As I mentioned in last week’s post-election article concerning the possible impact of the 2019 election on the civil rights of Virginia’s gun owners, after the 2019 special session failed to yield any results, the Virginia State Crime Commission (VSCC) conducted hearings on the governor’s proposals to study what effect they each might have on actual crime in the Commonwealth.

Earlier today (November 12, 2019), the VSCC released their report.

It had been my hope that the report would contain technical details to counteract the significant amount of misinformation regarding items such as suppressors and so-called ‘assault firearms’.  However, that is not what we received.

On the other hand, the report also does not provide any support for the governor’s recommendations, rather noting that “inconclusive evidence exists to develop recommendations.”

Further commentary will follow.  In the meantime, the complete report is embedded below:

Download (PDF, 931KB)

Posted in Virginia Law, Virginia Politics, Virginia State Crime Commission | Comments Off on The Virginia State Crime Commission has issued their report on gun violence

What does the 2019 election mean to Virginia gun owners and FFLs?

What does the 2019 election mean to Virginia gun owners and FFLs?

Since the 2019 election, my phone has been ringing non-stop.  Gun owners and dealers have heard the Governor and the newly-elected majority bragging about their plans to decimate the right to keep and bear arms in the Commonwealth and they are rightfully concerned.  The question on everyone’s mind is “What does the 2019 election mean to Virginia gun owners and FFLs?

Many people have expressed an intent to move out of state.

Others are insisting that they will not comply with any new laws that infringe upon the rights of law-abiding gun owners.

Dealers are asking whether  it is worth it to keep their SOT or make new investments in their business.

Buyers are asking whether they should even bother completing Form 4s for newly purchased suppressors.

Other, more pragmatic, callers are asking focused questions about the scope of the proposed laws, whether there will be any grandfathering, or if there will be compensation for items banned.

But all of them share one thing in common … they want to understand just how bad the legal environment will be after the 2020 session and want advice on what to do.

I, as a gun owner myself, understand and share in these concerns.  While it is clear that gun-owners are going to be the stalking horse for all the problems faced by this administration, my short-term advice is this … “for now act as if nothing has changed.

Let me explain …

1)  The bills that were introduced during the special session were intended to make a political statement rather than to present actual effective legislation.  They were a kitchen-sink of gun control items to distract from the scandals plaguing the Governor and Lt. Governor and to secure the support of gun-control groups for the 2019 election.  We will certainly see the same proposals again but the ones that will be introduced in the Spring will almost certainly have key differences and until we see those differences, we cannot evaluate the effects and chances at passage.

2)  After the special session failed to yield any results, the Virginia State Crime Commission conducted hearings on the proposals to study what effect they each might have on actual crime in the Commonwealth.  The Virginia State Crime Commission is bi-partisan and should be counted upon to deliver advice that actually speaks to the real data concerning the various proposals.  For example, that suppressors do not ‘silence’ a firearm any more than a muffler silences a dump truck.  It merely reduces the sound so that hearing protection can more adequately protect a shooter’s hearing.

3)  There are those in the governor’s party who are ‘moderates’ (or who at least act moderate due pressure from their constituents) and who will not be willing to support some of the more draconian of his proposals.  Any findings from the Crime Commission will provide political cover to these ‘moderates’.  It is my hope that the proposed suppressor ban in particular may fall due to this combination.  I hope it may also be a stumbling block to the ‘assault firearm’ ban, at least in its current form.

4)  Even if some, or all, of the governor’s proposals are signed into law, the versions passed will of necessity almost certainly have elements of grandfathering, phase-in periods, etc., and will not take effect until July 1, 2020.  And even then, I fully anticipate that VCDL, NRA, GOA, and possibly other gun rights groups will be mounting legal challenges that may result in the laws being delayed in implementation.  All of this gives those who may wish to move their families or collections out of state plenty of time to react after we know the actual details of what we are facing and can craft appropriate solutions.

NOTE:  I have been asked several time whether these could be passed as Emergency Legislation and therefore go into effect prior to July 1.  The answer is a resounding “No”.

Pursuant to Article 4, § 13 of the Virginia Constitution as well as § 1-214 of the Code of Virginia, they would require a four-fifths vote of the members in each house of the General Assembly and they do not have anywhere close to that kind of support.

5)  If gun owners stop participating in the firearms economy now for fear of what might happen then they will end up destroying those businesses who have invested their lives in the industry.  It would be truly short-sighted for gun owners to destroy the industry by non-participation before any bills are even re-introduced.  Instead, support your local gun shop, add to your collection, stock up on accessories!

6) We are seeing a groundswell of localities that are passing “Second Amendment Sanctuary” resolutions which promise non-enforcement of unconstitutional laws. Given the number that have already adopted such resolutions and the number scheduled for debate, it is extremely likely that by January 8th when the session officially starts, over 75% of all localities will have passed such resolutions.  Politicians, even ideologues, respect only two things, money and numbers.  Such an unprecedented groundswell will give pause to all but the most ardent supporter of civilian disarmament.  See the latest map below:

Please understand that this advice is merely meant to answer the questions we are all facing in the days following the election.  I am not saying that gun owners should stick their heads in the sand.  Nor am I saying that things will be fine.  They most certainly will not be fine.  We are facing a focused attempt to destroy the traditions of shooting sports in the Commonwealth. However, we need to continue to fight within the political and legal channels available to us to try and minimize the impact.

I will update this post as more information becomes available.


Take Action in The Meantime

In the meantime, people want to know what they can do.  With the full disclosure that I am an unpaid member of the Board of Directors of VCDL, I suggest the following:

1) Join the Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL).

2) Sign up for the VCDL VA-ALERT email list.

3) Contact your Senator and Delegate and tell them you expect them to oppose these bills.

4) Do whatever is necessary to be at the VCDL Lobby Day on Monday January 20, 2020.

5)  Work to have your locality pass a Second Amendment Sanctuary resolution.  While the effect of these is largely symbolic, they send a powerful message to the incoming majority that any attempt at banning or confiscating firearms will run counter to the will of the majority of Virginians.  You may download the VCDL Model Resolution here.

6) Encourage your friends and family members do repeat these steps.

Posted in Age To Possess, AR-15, Assault Firearms, NFA Trusts, Virginia Law, Virginia Politics | Comments Off on What does the 2019 election mean to Virginia gun owners and FFLs?

May non-immigrant aliens buy firearms?

May non-immigrant aliens buy firearms?

In the United States, citizenship is a complicated issue and it becomes even more so when firearms are involved.  A very common question I am asked is “May non-immigrant aliens buy firearms?

The answer, as is often the case with legal questions, is “maybe.”  To fully answer the question, we need to further explore the details of a given client’s immigration status.

I should note that this particular article is focused on the issues faced by non-immigrant aliens and does not address green-card holders, who are generally treated like U.S. citizens where firearm laws are concerned.  I have a separate article on green card holders and firearms which goes into further detail.

Federal Law

Returning to today’s question of “May non-immigrant aliens buy firearms?”, we will first address federal law.  You start by asking whether or not the client is a ‘documented’ alien.   This means that they have one or more of the following (even those admitted under refugee status will have one or more of these):

  • A#- Alien Number
  • AR# – Alien Registration Number
  • USCIS# – United States Citizenship and Immigrations Services Number
  • I-94# – Arrival and Departure Record Number

If the client is undocumented, then they are not able to purchase, possess, or transport firearms in the United States until that requirement is satisfied.

If they have an appropriate identification number then the next key question is whether they were admitted under a Visa.

If they were NOT admitted  under a Visa (e.g. Visa Waiver Program) then they MAY purchase and possess firearms in the United States as long as they are not otherwise prohibited and do not require any further exceptions to qualify.  The ATF has a Q&A document available here with more details.

If they WERE admitted under a Visa (student, etc.) then they may only purchase and possess firearms under federal law if they meet one of the exceptions laid out in § 18 USC 922(y)(2).  It states:

An alien admitted to the United States under a non-immigrant visa is not prohibited from purchasing, receiving, or possessing a firearm if the alien:

(1) is in possession of a hunting license or permit lawfully issued by the Federal Government, a State or local government, or an Indian tribe federally recognized by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, which is valid and unexpired;

(2) was admitted to the United States for lawful hunting or sporting purposes;

(3) has received a waiver from the prohibition from the Attorney General of the United States;

(4) is an official representative of a foreign government who is accredited to the United States Government or the Government’s mission to an international organization having its headquarters in the United States;

(5) is an official representative of a foreign government who is en route to or from another country to which that alien is accredited;

(6) is an official of a foreign government or a distinguished foreign visitor who has been so designated by the Department of State; or

(7) is a foreign law enforcement officer of a friendly foreign government entering the United States on official law enforcement business.

The first of these is by far the most common / important.  However, one should be careful not to assume that just any hunting license will suffice.  In this article from Arizona, we see that eight Chinese students were charged, and their firearms seized, due to their having a ‘resident’ hunting license which, under Arizona state law, they were not qualified to receive.  Therefore, the firearms they acquired using the license were considered to have been fraudulently and illegally obtained.  If they had acquired a non-resident hunting license then the entire affair could have been avoided.

State Law

Before you assume that you have a handle on all the permutations, do not forget that state law may impose additional restrictions beyond that imposed by federal law.  For example, in Virginia, a non-immigrant alien (of any status) cannot possess any firearm that meets the statutory definition of ‘assault firearm’.

§ 18.2-308.2:01. Possession or transportation of certain firearms by certain persons.

A. It shall be unlawful for any person who is not a citizen of the United States or who is not a person lawfully admitted for permanent residence to knowingly and intentionally possess or transport any assault firearm or to knowingly and intentionally carry about his person, hidden from common observation, an assault firearm.

B. It shall be unlawful for any person who is not a citizen of the United States and who is not lawfully present in the United States to knowingly and intentionally possess or transport any firearm or to knowingly and intentionally carry about his person, hidden from common observation, any firearm. A violation of this section shall be punishable as a Class 6 felony.

C. For purposes of this section, “assault firearm” means any semi-automatic center-fire rifle or pistol that expels single or multiple projectiles by action of an explosion of a combustible material and is equipped at the time of the offense with a magazine which will hold more than 20 rounds of ammunition or designed by the manufacturer to accommodate a silencer or equipped with a folding stock.

Therefore, when asking the question “May non-immigrant aliens buy firearms?”, it is imperative that a non-immigrant alien understand not only the federal framework, but also any state limitations or prohibitions before they attempt to purchase, possess, or transport any firearms.


Disclaimer:  This information is presented for educational purposes only and does not give rise to an attorney-client relationship. Additionally, I am licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of Virginia and this answer may not be appropriate for other states.

Posted in ATF, BATFE, Federal Law, Non-Immigrant Aliens, Prohibited Persons, Student Visa | Comments Off on May non-immigrant aliens buy firearms?