The Senate Courts of Justice Committee has killed Delegate LaRock’s CLEO sign-off bill

Virginia LegislatureThis legislative session Delegate LaRock has been a steadfast friend to NFA collectors in Virginia and deserves our thanks and support.

He has introduced two bills this session that directly affect NFA applications in the Commonwealth.

The first of these, and the one I must update you on, is HB 878.

Realizing that the ATF proposed rule 41p is still lurking on the horizon to potentially subject trust applicants to the same CLEO sign-off ban suffered by individual applicants, Delegate LaRock introduced this bill to protect Virginia’s NFA collectors from being arbitrarily denied the right to even submit an NFA application.

His bill would have simply required Virginia CLEOs to sign-off on NFA applications for qualified applicants so that they are not subject to an arbitrary ban based upon where they live in the Commonwealth.  Applicants who receive CLEO sign-off would still need to go through the exhaustive, multi-month application, background check, and registration process that applies to all NFA items.

However, despite passing the republican controlled House of Delegates on a 64 to 32 vote, today the Senate Courts of Justice Committee killed the bill for the year on a 9 to 5 party-line vote.

Those who voted against the bill were Senators Marsh, McEachin, Saslaw, Howell, Lucas, Edwards, Puller, Petersen, and Wexton.

Despite giving lip service to their supposed support for the Second Amendment and for background checks, the democrats on the committee chose to subject Virginia’s NFA collectors to an arbitrary ban rather than support a system of extensive background checks and registration that has been in place of three-quarters of a century.

It seems to me that bans are what they really support.

Posted in CLEO Sign-Off, NFA Trusts, Virginia Law | Comments Off on The Senate Courts of Justice Committee has killed Delegate LaRock’s CLEO sign-off bill

The VSP has clarified the machine gun registration issue

Virginia_State_PoliceLast week I wrote about a recent Attorney General’s opinion which stated that machine guns could not be registered to trusts in Virginia.

At the end of that article, I noted that I was waiting for a callback from both the Virginia State Police and the ATF regarding the next steps for those affected by the opinion.

Today, I spoke with Virginia State Police Legal Services Officer Tom Lambert and I received some very good news for those who currently own a machine gun in a trust, have an application pending to transfer a machine gun to their trust, or those who simply wish to do so in the future.

According to Mr. Lambert, there has been quite a bit of miscommunication concerning the issue and the impact of the opinion is not nearly as dire as we have been led to believe.

Let me see if I can summarize our discussion …

Apparently the State Police has, for quite some time now, required one of the trustees of a trust to register any machine guns owned by the trust in their own name (as trustee) when submitting a form SP-115.  The name of the trust would then be entered in the field for ‘BUSINESS FIRM OR GOVERNMENT ENTITY NAME’.

This allowed the State Police to register the machine gun in accordance with their interpretation (since validated) of the Uniform Machine Gun Act while still allowing trusts to ‘own’ the machine guns for ATF application purposes.

So what changed?

Last year a trustee challenged this policy, demanding to only provide the name of the trust on the Sp-115 without revealing his own name.  His argument was that the trust owned the firearm and therefore the trust was the only legal entity that should be required to submit its information on the form.

That case provided the impetus for the original question submitted to then-Attorney General Cuccinelli which gave rise to the now-infamous opinion that many of us, myself included, interpreted as a complete bar to machine gun ownership by trusts in the Commonwealth.

But that is not the how the State Police interprets the situation.

According to Mr. Lambert, the position of the State Police has not changed in the slightest. AG Cuccinelli’s opinion merely validated their current process in the face of the challenge raised by the trustee who did not wish to submit his personal information to the registry.

As far as they are concerned, trusts may still own machine guns so long as the SP-115 registration form is submitted within 24 hours of the machine gun’s acquisition and is completed by submitting the name of one of the trustees in Part A with the name of the trust included in the field reserved for ‘BUSINESS FIRM OR GOVERNMENT ENTITY NAME’.

He went on to say that they are aware of Delegate LaRock’s bill (HB 1266) to correct this issue.

In the meantime, he assured me that no one needs to withdraw a pending application to the ATF nor do they need to fear if they already have a registered machine gun owned by a trust.  Machine gun collectors may breathe a collective sigh of relief.

I have also spoken with my point of contact at the ATF and he confirmed that they have been in contact with the VSP and  are aware that there is no bar to approval of machine gun applications for trusts in the Commonwealth.

So … to summarize … while it is absolutely true that machine guns may not be currently ‘registered’ to trusts in Virginia, the VSP are more than willing to let a trust ‘own’ the machine gun so long as it is registered at the state level to a trustee of the trust.

Posted in AG Opinions, ATF, Form 4, Form 5, Machine Guns, NFA Trusts, Virginia Law | Comments Off on The VSP has clarified the machine gun registration issue

May I abbreviate my trust name when I engrave an SBR?

EngravingRecently a client called me to ask if he could abbreviate his trust name when he engraved an SBR.

As one might expect in the Google age, prior to calling me he had searched on the internet and, based upon what he had found there, was already convinced that it would be acceptable.

The only problem is that it’s definitely not acceptable to the ATF.

Let me reiterate that … you can not abbreviate your trust name when engraving an SBR (or any other personally manufactured NFA item).  You must engrave the full and exact name of the trust.

I believe that the confusion arises from the wording of 27 CFR § 479.102(a)(2)(iii) which requires that

(a) You, as a manufacturer, importer, or maker of a firearm, must legibly identify the firearm as follows:

(2) By engraving, casting, stamping (impressing), or otherwise conspicuously placing or causing to be engraved, cast, stamped (impressed), or placed on the frame, receiver, or barrel thereof certain additional information.

(iii) Your name (or recognized abbreviation) …

That makes perfect sense when applied to an individual applicant.  For example, ‘Jr’ is a ‘recognized abbreviation‘ for Junior when used in the context of a name.  The use of the abbreviation does not change the legal person which is being referenced.

However, the same is not true where a trust is concerned.  A trust, by definition, is a legal entity with a specific name.  In that context, the ‘John Pierce Junior Trust’ is absolutely not the same thing as the ‘John Pierce Jr Trust’.

The ATF has actually rejected Form 1 applications when the proposed engraving did not match the full legal name of the trust.  See the following rejection letter which has been widely distributed amongst the NFA community.

Engraving Error_Document

These types of issues can be avoided by working with an experienced attorney to draft your NFA trust.  Picking a name that is suitable for engraving is the first step in putting together a trust that will serve you both today and in the years to come.

After all, just because you are only buying a suppressor today doesn’t mean that you won’t be building an SBR tomorrow. If there is one thing that we all know about building an NFA collection it’s this … you can’t stop at just one.

Posted in ATF, BATFE, Engraving, Form 1, Manufacturing, NFA Trusts, SBR, Short Barreled Rifles, Short Barreled Shotguns | Comments Off on May I abbreviate my trust name when I engrave an SBR?

Currently machine guns cannot be registered to trusts in Virginia

VA_MG_Opinion** There is an update to this article **

In December of last year, I received several calls from NFA dealers who had been told by ATF employees that there was a change upcoming regarding the use of trusts to own NFA items in Virginia.

Following on the heels of the disastrous 41p proposed rulemaking by the ATF, this news had these dealers understandably concerned. They were fearful that the incoming Governor of Virginia might be planning some sort of administrative attack on NFA ownership in the Commonwealth.

The actual issue as it turns out only involves the use of a trust to register machine guns.

Let’s start with a little background.

While allowing ownership of all NFA items save one (assuming compliance with all federal laws), the Commonwealth of Virginia additionally requires that machine guns (and only machine guns) be registered with the state.

This registration is governed by the Uniform Machine Gun Act as codified at § 18.2-295 et seq.  of the code of Virginia.  However, in this act at § 18.2-299, the definition of a ‘person’ who may register a machine gun in overly narrow.  The statute states that a ‘Person’ “applies to and includes firm, partnership, association or corporation.

This definition is substantially narrower than the general definition of ‘Person’ in the Code of Virginia which is codified at § 1-230 and defines a ‘Person’ as “any individual, corporation, partnership, association, cooperative, limited liability company, trust, joint venture, government, political subdivision, or any other legal or commercial entity and any successor, representative, agent, agency, or instrumentality thereof.

Based upon this difference, sometime last year, Colonel Flaherty, Superintendent of the Virginia State Police wrote to then-Attorney General Cuccinelli and posed the question of “whether a trust may register a machine gun in Virginia under the Uniform Machine Gun Act.

In an opinion dated November 27th, 2013, Attorney General Cuccinelli opined that “a trust may not register a machine gun pursuant to the Uniform Machine Gun Act as enacted by the Virginia General Assembly.

His reasoning was that “When the legislature omits language from one statute that it has included in another, courts may not construe the former statute to include that language, as doing so would ignore ‘an unambiguous manifestation of a contrary intention’ of the legislature.

In other words, the term ‘Person’ is already defined in the Code of Virginia and includes trusts.  In specifically adding a section to the Uniform Machine Gun Act defining the term more narrowly, one has to assume the omission was intentional on the part of the legislature.

So … where does this leave us?  The ‘change’ that the dealers were told was upcoming is this … Machine guns may no longer be registered to trusts in Virginia.

We are still awaiting clarification of what will happen to those machine guns that are already registered to trusts.  In addition, I am awaiting clarification from the ATF on how applicants who submitted Form 4 or Form 5 transfers which are still in process should proceed.

In the meantime, Virginia Delegate Dave Larock has introduced HB 1266 to correct this issue.  This bill is currently before the House Militia, Police, and Public Safety Committee.

Given these changes, what should you as an NFA collector do?

1)  If you currently own a machine gun in a trust you should immediately contact the attorney who formed your NFA trust and work with him or her to protect your assets.

2) If you support Delegate LaRock’s bill to add trusts to the list of entities which may register machine guns in the Commonwealth then might I suggest you use the ‘Write Your Legislators’ tool provided by VCDL to email the House Militia, Police, and Public Safety Committee.  The tool will send your message to every single member of the committee.

** There is an update to this article **

Posted in AG Opinions, Estate Planning, Form 4, Form 5, Machine Guns, NFA Trusts, Virginia Law | Comments Off on Currently machine guns cannot be registered to trusts in Virginia

Will my beneficiaries have to pay a transfer tax when my NFA trust distributes my assets?

inheritanceThe short answer is “No. At least not currently.”  But that qualifier is an important part of the answer.

Currently the ATF allows transfers of NFA items to devisees, heirs, or specified beneficiaries to be tax-free via a Form 5.

The reason that such transfers are tax-free is because the ATF considers such transfers to not be “voluntary transfers” but rather “transfers by operation of law.

However, this is a policy only and is not backed up by a promulgated regulation. Therefore, there is the possibility that they may change their position at some time in the future.

If they were to make such a policy change, it would not only affect items owned by NFA trusts but also those owned by individuals and would certainly face stiff opposition from both NFA collectors and industry groups.

My personal prediction is that we will not see a change in this policy unless it is politically motivated and part of a larger attack on NFA ownership.

Posted in ATF, BATFE, Estate Planning, Form 5, NFA Trusts | Comments Off on Will my beneficiaries have to pay a transfer tax when my NFA trust distributes my assets?