Want to get your manufacturers FFL? Don’t forget ITAR!

ITARLast week I received a call from an FFL client who was concerned about a conversation he had with an ATF agent during a routine audit.

My client holds a manufacturing FFL but has never actually engaged in manufacturing since his retail business has happily continued to grow and take up all of his available time.  However, the ATF agent told him that, as a manufacturer (active or not), he needed to register with the State Department and pay a yearly fee.

At the end of call, he had two basic questions:

“What requirement was the agent talking about?”

and

“Do I really need to register and pay this fee?”

Let’s start with the first question.  The ATF agent was referring to the requirements of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) which were promulgated to implement the provisions of the Arms Export Control Act of 1976 (AECA).

My client had searched on the internet and spoken with other manufacturing FFLs.  Some had registered and paid the fee and some had not.  Those who had not stated various beliefs such as “You don’t have to register if you make fewer than 50 items per year.”

That sounded reasonable to my client and it momentarily reassured him.  But this is nothing more than an internet rumor.  The regulation which governs the registration requirement makes it clear.

Any person who engages in the United States in the business of either manufacturing or exporting defense articles or furnishing defense services is required to register with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. For the purpose of this subchapter, engaging in the business of manufacturing or exporting defense articles or furnishing defense services requires only one occasion of manufacturing or exporting a defense article or furnishing a defense service. Manufacturers who do not engage in exporting must nevertheless register.

As for what constitutes ‘defense articles’, 22 USC 121 contains a complete listing under what is known as The United States Munitions List (USML).  The very first item listed is “Nonautomatic and semi-automatic firearms to caliber .50 inclusive.”  It goes on to include “Ammunition/ordnance for the articles [above].”

The short answer is that those licensed to manufacture firearms or ammunition are covered by ITAR and are required to register and pay the registration fee.

So … how bad is this fee?  It’s pretty bad.  If you are not engaged in exporting then you would be considered a ‘Tier 1’ registrant.  Therefore you would only have to pay the lowest possible fee.

A set fee of $2,250 per year is required for new registrants or registrants for whom the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls has not reviewed, adjudicated or issued a response to any applications during a 12-month period ending 90 days prior to expiration of the current registration.

After I explained this to my client, he asked “Why haven’t I heard about this before?  Why doesn’t the ATF tell us about it?”  Well … they do … sort of.

In the ATF Importation Guidebook they note that “In order to engage in the business of exporting, manufacturing, or brokering items on the USMIL you must be registered with the Department of State which administers the export and manufacturing provisions of the AECA. Generally, persons holding a manufacturer’s FFL (Types 06, 07, and 10) must register as a manufacturer with the Department of State unless specifically exempted.

Are there 06, 07, or 10 type FFLs who have not registered and have not been prosecuted? Yes there are.  But they could be prosecuted at any time and the penalties are severe.

Is it stupid?  Of course it is!  But legally there is no question.  If you are getting, or already have, an 06, 07, or 10 FFL then you need to consider the ITAR yearly registration fee as a cost of doing business and register.

Disclaimer:  This information is presented for educational purposes only and does not give rise to an attorney-client relationship. Additionally, I am licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of Virginia and this answer may not be appropriate for other states.

Posted in AECA, ATF, BATFE, Federal Law, FFL Issues, ITAR, Manufacturing, USMIL, USML | Comments Off on Want to get your manufacturers FFL? Don’t forget ITAR!

How do I expedite a Form 20?

UrgentEarlier this week I received a call from a client who had a last-minute opportunity to attend an out-of-state hunting event.  While he was excited about the opportunity, he had a problem.  The gun he wanted to take was an SBR and he did not have a Form 20 for the location where the hunt was taking place.

His question was “Is it possible to expedite my Form 20?

I gave him the quintessential legal answer … “Maybe.

After I spoke with the client, I called my point-of-contact at the NFA Branch and asked what application method would give my client the best chance for a quick approval.  While he would make no guarantees, he verified that the following process would offer the best chance:

  1. Have a good reason to need the Form 20 expedited.  This is not a process to use for all your Form 20s.
  2. Call first and let your examiner know that the expedited request is being faxed.
  3. Fax the completed Form 20 to (304) 616-4501.
  4. Include a cover sheet requesting an ‘Expedited Review’
  5. Include full contact information on the cover sheet including a return fax number.

For those of you who have more time, remember that you can get Form 20s approved for up to a year at a time.  Plan early for scheduled hunting trips and shooting events.

Posted in ATF, BATFE, Form 20, Interstate Firearm Transfers, Interstate Travel, NFA Trusts, SBR, Short Barreled Rifles | Comments Off on How do I expedite a Form 20?

Gun rights restoration is a state-by-state process

Out_Of_StateSince publishing my article about Virginia not recognizing out-of-state gun-rights restorations I have been inundated with questions.

The first group of questions prompted a second article about whether a non-resident with a Virginia conviction could get their gun rights restored in Virginia.  The answer by the way … was “No.”  UPDATE:  Since July 1, 2015 that answer has changed.  Non-residents may now get their gun rights restored in Virginia.

The second group of questions was about restoration for federal offenses.  The short answer for those questions is “There currently is no method by which you may have your rights restored.

That left those questions asking some version of whether another state would recognize the gun rights of those who have had them restored in Virginia.  Before going into the details, let me go ahead and tell you the answer … “Probably not.

When I shared this answer with one client, he asked if I thought such a ban would survive a court challenge.  I told him that I believe it would and here is why:

In the DC v. Heller decision, the  United States Supreme Court reiterated that the “opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons.”  This seems to preclude a rights-based challenge to state felon-in-possession laws.

Without a rights-based challenge, we look to statutory law, both federal and state, for guidance.

At the federal level, possession by those convicted of a felony is addressed in a number of provisions of 18 u.S.C. § 922.  However, 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(20) exempts those who have “been pardoned or [have] had civil rights restored” from these prosecutions. However, it does not require states to recognize each other’s rights-restoration processes.

Therefore, it is entirely up to each state as to whether they (a) allow convicted felons to seek the restoration of gun rights at all and (b) recognize other state’s restoration orders.

A few local examples that illustrate the issue are North Carolina and West Virginia.

While I am not licensed to practice law in North Carolina, a University of North Carolina School of Government guide on the topic notes that “G.S. 14-415.4(c) states that a person may petition the court for a restoration order if his or her civil rights, including the right to possess a firearm, have been restored in the other jurisdiction for at least 20 years.

You read that right … according to the article, if you have your rights restored in Virginia and then move to North Carolina … you need only wait a couple of decades before you can petition to have them restored in North Carolina.

What about West Virginia?  While I am similarly not licensed to practice law in West Virginia, it appears that they have the same statutory issue as Virginia.  § 61-7-7(c) of the WV Code allows a person to “petition the circuit court of the county in which he or she resides to regain the ability to possess a firearm.

So what does this all mean?  Can you summarize it for me?

While there may be states that automatically recognize gun-rights restorations from other states, I don’t have an example of one that does.

Generally you should assume that a gun-rights restoration in a given state only allows you to purchase, possess, and transport firearms in that state!

Posted in Criminal Law, Federal Law, Gun Rights Restoration, Interstate Firearm Transfers, Interstate Move, Interstate Travel, Virginia Law | Comments Off on Gun rights restoration is a state-by-state process

We have another eForms update

logo_eFormsToday the ATF announced that more forms are being returned to eForms over the next month.

But … before you ask … Forms 3 and 4 are NOT included in the list.

Perhaps most useful to NFA owners, Form 5 is being returned to service immediately.  Form 5 is used to transfer NFA items tax-free to lawful heirs or beneficiaries of a trust.

The entire notice is as follows:

ATF is pleased to announce the return of the following eForms to active service: ATF Form 5 on 8/27/2014, ATF Form 9 on 9/2/2014, and ATF Form 5300.11 (AFMER) on 9/5/2014.

Please note that at this time no date has been determined for the return of the ATF Forms 3 and Form 4 to service on the current platform. In the interim, ATF has devoted additional resources to paper forms processing within the NFA Branch to augment the volume of receipts and current pending applications.

Here’s hoping that Forms 3 and 4 will be part of the next roll-out.

Posted in ATF, BATFE, eForms, Form 4, Form 5, NFA Trusts | Comments Off on We have another eForms update

Purchase, possession, and transportation of a firearm while under felony indictment in Virginia

IndictmentA recent posting at OpenCarry.org reveals that, when asked by clients, many defense attorneys are themselves not completely sure of the effects of an indictment on the accused’s right to purchase, possess, or transport firearms.

But an understanding of this issue is crucial for the person being indicted since a misstep can lead to additional charges, bail being revoked, and plea bargain offers being withdrawn.

Let’s take a quick look at state and federal laws that are on-point …

Purchase

In this area, federal law governs.  18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(1) prohibits the sale of firearms and ammunition to those “under indictment for … a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.”  

Subsection (n) of this section further prohibits “any person who is under indictment for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year to … receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.

These prohibitions, unlike some others, do not simply apply to licensed dealers but to all sales including private sales between individuals.

Question 11(b) on the federal form 4473 completed by a prospective buyer attempting to purchase a firearm asks “Are you under indictment or information in any court for a felony, or any other crime, for which the judge could imprison you for more than one year?

If you answer “Yes” to this question then the dealer will refuse the sale.  If you answer “No” to this question then you are committing both a state and federal felony by willfully making a materially false statement.  Under Virginia law, this will be prosecuted under § 18.2-308.2:2(K) of the Code of Virginia.

It is especially important to note than an Alford plea with deferred disposition does NOT extinguish an indictment until such time as the court actually acquits.  Therefore, during the time that the disposition is deferred, the accused remains under indictment for purposes of this prohibition.  This was the key question in the January 2014 case of Maldonado-Mejia v. Commonwealth.

Transportation

Federal law also contains a prohibition at 18 U.S.C. § 922(n) prohibiting the interstate transportation of firearms or ammunition by anyone “who is under indictment for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.

But what about transportation inside the state?  There is no state law that prohibits the transportation of a legally owned firearm by someone under indictment.  However, if the accused has a Concealed Handgun Permit (CHP), § 18.2-308.013(B) of the Code of Virginia states that:

An individual who has a felony charge pending or a charge pending for an offense listed in subdivision 14 or 15 of § 18.2-308.09, holding a permit for a concealed handgun, may have the permit suspended by the court before which such charge is pending or by the court that issued the permit.

While the statute says that the permit “may” be suspended, the accused would be well served to not exercise the privilege of concealed carry until they are certain that their permit has not been suspended.

Possession

Neither federal nor Virginia state law directly prohibits the simple possession of otherwise legally obtained firearms by a person under felony indictment.

However, it is often in the best interests of the accused to transfer ownership and control of such firearms to a trusted family member or friend until the issues giving rise to the indictment have been resolved.

Finally

This discussion may be moot in any case since the conditions of bail often will stipulate that the accused not possess firearms.  Any such stipulation would ultimately govern.

Disclaimer:  This information is presented for educational purposes only and does not give rise to an attorney-client relationship. Additionally, I am licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of Virginia and this answer may not be appropriate for other states.

Posted in Criminal Law, Indictment, Interstate Travel, Virginia Law | Comments Off on Purchase, possession, and transportation of a firearm while under felony indictment in Virginia