Category Archives: Federal Law

Does the Castleman holding overrule White?

There seems to be some disagreement in the legal community here in Virginia as to whether or not the decision in United States v. Castleman handed down by the United States Supreme Court earlier this year overruled the 4th Circuit’s … Continue reading

Posted in 4th Circuit, ATF, BATFE, Criminal Law, Domestic Violence, Federal Law, Virginia Law, Virginia State Police | Comments Off on Does the Castleman holding overrule White?

Does a protective order affect suppressors as well as firearms?

The issuance of a protective order has become an increasingly common event in our judicial system and those who own firearms need to be particularly aware of the implications of becoming the subject of such an order. And this is … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Law, NFA Trusts, Protective Orders, Suppressors | Comments Off on Does a protective order affect suppressors as well as firearms?

Want to get your manufacturers FFL? Don’t forget ITAR!

Last week I received a call from an FFL client who was concerned about a conversation he had with an ATF agent during a routine audit. My client holds a manufacturing FFL but has never actually engaged in manufacturing since … Continue reading

Posted in AECA, ATF, BATFE, Federal Law, FFL Issues, ITAR, Manufacturing, USMIL, USML | Comments Off on Want to get your manufacturers FFL? Don’t forget ITAR!

Gun rights restoration is a state-by-state process

Since publishing my article about Virginia not recognizing out-of-state gun-rights restorations I have been inundated with questions. The first group of questions prompted a second article about whether a non-resident with a Virginia conviction could get their gun rights restored in … Continue reading

Posted in Criminal Law, Federal Law, Gun Rights Restoration, Interstate Firearm Transfers, Interstate Move, Interstate Travel, Virginia Law | Comments Off on Gun rights restoration is a state-by-state process

D.C. announces intent to make permitting system “as restrictive as possible”

It was no surprise when a 90 day stay was granted in the case of Palmer v. D.C.   And it should come as no surprise that D.C. is planning to use that time to make sure that whatever system ultimately … Continue reading

Posted in 4th Circuit, DC Law, Federal Law, Second Amendment | Comments Off on D.C. announces intent to make permitting system “as restrictive as possible”