-
“John represented me at my hearing in Fairfax County Circuit Court for my Petition for Restoration of Firearms Rights. My case was a bit complex and it incorporated some new legislation that John was very educated on. The legislation was so new that the Commonwealth’s Attorney and the Judge did not have any knowledge of it. John’s actions in the courtroom to bring the new legislation to the attention of the court were astonishing and brilliant; even bringing a smile to the Judge and pat on the back from a fellow attorney after the hearing.
John’s flat rate pricing for representation is amazingly affordable. He is true to his word, communicates through out the entire process and works diligently to represent you. I highly recommend John Pierce.” - Shawn
Outstanding Service
“I contacted John via email regarding trust and estate work that I needed and questions that I had. He called me that same day, walked me through the process, took adequate time and was very patient in responding to my questions. He is very down to earth and professional. I was astounded as I found he was on travel, yet he took the time to personally contact me. He was very responsive in following up with the documents that I needed. I am extremely pleased and appreciative of the time he took with me and his outstanding level of service. I've worked with a number of attorneys in my profession and John exceeds the standards that I am accustomed to. I highly recommend him.” - Ron
Category Archives: Federal Law
Does a protective order affect suppressors as well as firearms?
The issuance of a protective order has become an increasingly common event in our judicial system and those who own firearms need to be particularly aware of the implications of becoming the subject of such an order. And this is … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Law, NFA Trusts, Protective Orders, Suppressors
Comments Off on Does a protective order affect suppressors as well as firearms?
Want to get your manufacturers FFL? Don’t forget ITAR!
Last week I received a call from an FFL client who was concerned about a conversation he had with an ATF agent during a routine audit. My client holds a manufacturing FFL but has never actually engaged in manufacturing since … Continue reading
Posted in AECA, ATF, BATFE, Federal Law, FFL Issues, ITAR, Manufacturing, USMIL, USML
Comments Off on Want to get your manufacturers FFL? Don’t forget ITAR!
Gun rights restoration is a state-by-state process
Since publishing my article about Virginia not recognizing out-of-state gun-rights restorations I have been inundated with questions. The first group of questions prompted a second article about whether a non-resident with a Virginia conviction could get their gun rights restored in … Continue reading
Posted in Criminal Law, Federal Law, Gun Rights Restoration, Interstate Firearm Transfers, Interstate Move, Interstate Travel, Virginia Law
Comments Off on Gun rights restoration is a state-by-state process
D.C. announces intent to make permitting system “as restrictive as possible”
It was no surprise when a 90 day stay was granted in the case of Palmer v. D.C. And it should come as no surprise that D.C. is planning to use that time to make sure that whatever system ultimately … Continue reading
Posted in 4th Circuit, DC Law, Federal Law, Second Amendment
Comments Off on D.C. announces intent to make permitting system “as restrictive as possible”
Did Abramski affect how organizations handle gun raffles?
Another question that has arisen since Monday’s holding in Abramski v. United States is whether the rules governing the acquisition of firearms for raffles were affected by the decision. The short answer is no. But there remains a great deal of confusion as … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Law, Firearms Raffles, SCOTUS, US Supreme Court
Comments Off on Did Abramski affect how organizations handle gun raffles?
