The easiest way to understand the arm brace rule

During one of the virtual training sessions the ATF held earlier this week, one of the presenters made a statement that I think bears repeating.  While it isn’t 100% perfect, I think it can help eliminate some of the misunderstandings that are rampant in the community right now.

What he said was effectively this (paraphrased since I don’t have a word for word transcript):

“The easiest way to understand the arm brace rule is to assume that all we have done is to declare arm braces to be butt stocks but with an amnesty period to come into compliance.”

That really does a good job of framing the issue and answering the questions that keep coming up.  For example:

Q:  What if I don’t want to register my pistol as an SBR?

A:  Then take off the “butt stock” and return it to pistol configuration before the end of the amnesty period.

Q: If I return it to pistol status, does this affect the type of buffer tube I can have on my pistol?

A:  No it does not. Once the ‘butt stock’ is removed, you have a non-nfa pistol. It doesn’t matter whether the pistol has a buffer tube that could possibly accept a ‘butt stock’ any more than it matters that a pistol has a rail which gives it the ability to accept a vertical foregrip. So long as the ‘butt stock’ is not equipped and not in a proximity that could give rise to claims of ‘constructive possession’, then it simply doesn’t matter.

Q:  What do I do with the “butt stock”?

A:  Keep it as an extra for a registered SBR, sell it, discard it, or destroy it.  But if keeping it, make sure your continued possession could not be construed as ‘constructive possession’.

Q:  Can dealers still sell “butt stocks”?

A:  Of course they can.  They are just accessories, and the ATF does not regulate accessories.  You just can’t use them to assemble an unregistered SBR from an AR pistol.

I will add more examples here as they occur to me.  But, as you are thinking about your questions, try to ask them by replacing ‘arm brace’ with ‘butt stock’ and see if the question doesn’t suddenly resolve itself.

Posted in 2021R-08F, Administrative Law, AR Pistols, Arm Brace, ATF, ATF Ruling, BATFE, Federal Law, SBR, Short Barreled Rifles, Stabilizing Brace | Comments Off on The easiest way to understand the arm brace rule

Flying with a suppressor

About once a month I receive a call or email asking about the legality and process of flying with a suppressor.

Invariably, I am asked whether or not the suppressor can be transported in carry-on luggage since it is merely a tube of metal incapable of doing anything by itself.

The answer is … NO!  You cannot transport a suppressor in carry-on luggage!

Pursuant to 18 U.S. Code § 921(a)(3), a firearm is defined as “(A) any weapon (including a starter gun) which will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive; (B) the frame or receiver of any such weapon; (C) any firearm muffler or firearm silencer; or (D) any destructive device. Such term does not include an antique firearm.”

This is the definition the TSA incorporates in their regulations and enforcement actions, and it most definitely does include suppressors.

Therefore, you should plan to declare your suppressor and transport it in a locked hard-sided container inside your checked luggage.  See the linked page on the TSA website for more details about flying with firearms and ammunition.

Posted in Federal Law, Flying With Firearms, Interstate Travel, Suppressors, TSA | Comments Off on Flying with a suppressor

The arm brace rule (2021R-08F) has been published in the Federal Register, so what do we do next?

As of January 31, 2023, the arm brace rule (2021R-08F) has been published in the Federal Register. and therefore, has the force and effect of law (unless overturned in the future by a legal challenge).

If you own an arm brace equipped pistol (shotguns and non-pistols are not covered under this rule) which is subject to the rule (see the ATF example document here), you have some decisions to make.

The first decision is whether or not to comply. There are numerous people online who are stating that they simply will not comply.

As an attorney, I cannot advise you to break or ignore the law.  My advice to my clients is to follow one of the compliance options the ATF has laid out in their FAQ while awaiting the results of the multiple legal challenges that are being mounted against the rule.

As laid out above, the options are:

1) Register the arm brace equipped pistol during the 120 day amnesty period to get a free SBR tax stamp.

2) Remove the arm brace from the pistol and either destroy it or remove it from the premises completely (the details of constructive possession are beyond the scope of this article).  This would remove the pistol from the purview of the rule since it is no longer equipped with an arm-brace.

3) Add a 16+ inch barrel to the pistol thereby removing it from the provisions of the NFA regardless of whether it has an arm brace on it.

The other two options, to surrender or destroy the pistol itself, are beyond stupid and deserve no more consideration.

If you have one of my NFA Trusts and wish to use the trust to apply for the free amnesty tax stamp, you need to document the fact that you assigned the arm brace equipped pistol to your trust prior to the date the rule was published.  This documentation is then uploaded during the eForm1 process.

Posted in 2021R-08F, Administrative Law, AR Pistols, Arm Brace, ATF, ATF Ruling, BATFE, eForms, Form 1, NFA Trusts, Regulatory Rulemaking, SBR, Short Barreled Rifles, Stabilizing Brace, Tax Stamp | Comments Off on The arm brace rule (2021R-08F) has been published in the Federal Register, so what do we do next?

Arm Brace Amnesty Period Countdown

Posted in 2021R-08F, AR Pistols, Arm Brace, ATF, ATF Ruling, SBR, Short Barreled Rifles, Stabilizing Brace | Comments Off on Arm Brace Amnesty Period Countdown

Documenting the date you assigned your arm brace pistol to your trust

The ATF has taken the position that, in order to register an SBR under the free tax stamp provision of the arm brace rule (2021R-08F), the pistol must  have already been assigned to, or owned by, the trust prior to the date of publication of the rule (January 31, 2023).

From the ATF FAQ

In the eForms system, they are requesting that you upload documentation showing when the arm brace equipped pistol was assigned to your trust.

The question then becomes what evidence will they accept?  On the eForms site, they state the following:

So how does one demonstrate the date that the assets were assigned to the trust, given that different states have different legal requirements concerning assigning assets to a trust.  For example, Virginia even allows assets to be held in trust based upon mere oral assertion:

Therefore, I believe that the ATF will face significant challenges in evaluating this requested ‘evidence’.  As for my clients, I suggest using an assignment sheet to document the date you first assigned the item to your trust.

Many clients have developed their own assignment sheets but I have prepared one that I encourage you to use when you submit your eForm 1 application for your new tax stamp.

You can download my non-NFA item assignment spreadsheet to document the date you assigned your arm brace equipped pistol(s) that you may wish to SBR under this rule to your trust. 

Download (XLSX, 13KB)

 

If you do not have Excel and need a PDF version to print and hand-enter the items then that may be downloaded here

Download (PDF, 49KB)

Regardless of which version you use, make sure you 1) put the name of the trust in the header where there is a blank line; 2) enter the date you assigned the pistol(s) to your trust in the line at the bottom right, and sign it on the line titled “Signed By: Settlor / Trustee

There has been a fierce debate online regarding what ‘evidence’ the ATF will require with many people who did their documentation prior to January 31, 2023 rushing out to have their assignment sheets notarized.  I certainly cannot guarantee how the ATF will handle this issue.  However, I can say that assignment sheets are NOT required by law to be notarized and any submission of documentation to the ATF is done under penalty of perjury.

Therefore, I personally believe that a signed and dated assignment sheet, attesting to the fact that you assigned the pistol(s) to the trust prior to the publication of the final rule in the Federal Register would be sufficient.

If you wish for me to assist you in the filing of your eForm application, please contact me.

Posted in 2021R-08F, Administrative Law, AR Pistols, Arm Brace, ATF, ATF Ruling, BATFE, eForms, Form 1, NFA Trusts, Regulatory Rulemaking, SBR, Short Barreled Rifles, Stabilizing Brace, Tax Stamp | Comments Off on Documenting the date you assigned your arm brace pistol to your trust